Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GameGO!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Scott Burley (talk) 22:19, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GameGO![edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Video game magazine that published exactly one issue before failing. Second issue was completed and released online as a pdf. Not notable and fails WP:GNG. Harizotoh9 (talk) 22:14, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 22:25, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 22:25, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I don't see any case to redirect it to GameFan either, as it has 0 presence in reliable sources. --Izno (talk) 23:17, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The article itself provides no sources, and I have been unable to find any myself after some searches. Which, is not very surprising given what a minor publication this magazine turned out to be. Rorshacma (talk) 16:04, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails the GNG, and reads like a vanity project/POV pushing eulogy. Sergecross73 msg me 18:55, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - one issue and a PDF does not make a magazine worthy of discussion, sadly. Mattsephton (talk) 14:49, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as severely non-notable. Only one published issue, and zero coverage in reliable sources (or even unreliable ones, for that matter). The mentioned coverage is not even enough for a mention in a section of another article, making redirecting a non-option. Geolodus (talk) 16:13, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Unsourced. Doesn't seem notable. Foxnpichu (talk) 16:52, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 07:17, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- Per all the above a single issue does not make a magazine notable. Alex-h (talk) 15:47, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There have been notable single issue magazines, this is not a notable single-issue magazine.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:04, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.