Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galore Park

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:54, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Galore Park[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Philafrenzy (talk) 00:25, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Reasonable coverage in Daily Telegraph; The Bookseller; Journal of Classics Teaching; &c. Andrew (talk) 13:00, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep manifestly notable publisher of publication which themselves have articles. Award winning. And covered substantially in reliable independent sources. Candleabracadabra (talk) 19:37, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Notable. Meets WP:CORPDEPTH. Source examples include:

The Telegraph
The Bookseller
GrowthBusiness. (Note regarding source reliability: Per [1], GrowthBusiness is owned by Vitesse Media plc, a media company quoted on the AIM market of the London Stock Exchange).

– Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:27, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, I was wrong about that one. I withdraw my nomination. Philafrenzy (talk) 00:37, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The nominator has withdrawn their nomination in the comment above. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:34, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.