The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedy delete. -Docask? 12:07, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Not quite nonsensical enough for a speedy delete, unfortunately. Reyk 23:23, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete what is certainly nonsense. Harro5 23:45, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
