Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gallery of Contemporary Sculpture and Plastic Arts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 11:49, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gallery of Contemporary Sculpture and Plastic Arts[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article, which was created by an editor named SGallery, is basically advertising for the gallery. It is unreferenced except for a link to the gallery. Although the gallery has a museum component, it also has multiple sales pages. I wasn't able to find independent sources for the article, although there may be some in Russian. Leschnei (talk) 13:16, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 13:20, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 13:20, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 13:20, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:50, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, Russian WP has an article here created around the same time by the same editor, no help there. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:11, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui ^雲 _水 11:36, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence of notability. SpinningSpark 18:47, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: WP:ARTSPAM with no effort to have provided even a modicum of sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:50, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.