Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galleria Supermarket (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-12-26 15:17Z

Galleria Supermarket[edit]

Fails WP:CORP. Was previously deleted yesterday (see previous AFD) but has been recreated by a contributor to the old article. Content is not the same as the old article, so I'm unwilling to speedy it. TomTheHand 20:01, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Article doesn't mention anything that would make me suspect it's any more notable than it was yesterday. Geoffrey Spear 20:14, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, article offers no notability although it tries too, but I doubt this was the 'first large scale retailer in the Toronto area'. Nuttah68 20:18, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Eaton's, The Bay, Loblaws, Canadian Tire, Simpson-Sears (remember when it was called that?), etc. would all doubt this claim as well. --Charlene 22:59, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Charlie 20:36, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the article still does not proove its notability and fails WP:CORP.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 20:57, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - doesn't pass WP:CORP and there's nothing really notable about this supermarket. Jayden54 21:43, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletions. --Slgr@ndson (page - messages - contribs) 21:55, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and for the exact same reasons in the previous AfD. In fact, I'd have little hesitation considering this for speedy under CSD G4 as the "new" article is substantially the same as the old article. Agent 86 22:23, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. One out of 500 Toronto supermarkets. Not notable. --Charlene 22:59, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete again Consider salting if re-recreated. Edison 00:48, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.