Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gale (loudspeaker)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 11:58, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gale (loudspeaker)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While this has been at AfD three times prior, the underlying issues remain, a BEFORE does not indicate significant, in depth coverage to meet WP:ORG. There is this review, but there's no indication that is a reliable source This is probably the best source along with this review and even together they're not enough.

A merger to Audio Partnership would also make sense as neither is too long as is, but given three prior AfDs I think this conversation deserves more light than proposed mergers do. StarM 16:06, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. StarM 16:06, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. StarM 16:06, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. StarM 16:06, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. StarM 16:06, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Prior AFDs as the template didn't pick them up. Feel free to remove if you know how to add into the template:
Delete nothing to suggest it actually meets the inclusion criteria for an organization.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:40, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 01:16, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: seems like past attempts have failed due to lack of participation, but this is a blatant advert with no secondary sources. Stereophile looks like a blog; The Age is not in-depth; What Hi-Fi? is possibly usable but not hugely impressive. (Good WP:BEFORE check by the nominator, it seems—can't find anything further, though it's tough to get the search terms.) The other claim to notability is the "awards" their website claims to run. I believe these types of consumer goods awards are given out to basically anybody who pays for them (they'll do 6 products per category and companies will enter their products in 6 categories for a few thousand pounds so it's very hard not to win). I would check that these particular awards fall in that category but it doesn't matter anyway as this wouldn't be enough for GNG given the context of at most one further good source. — Bilorv (talk) 01:44, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Bilorv and nominator - fails WP:NCORP quite clearly in my opinion. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 07:38, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete utterly fails WP:NCORP. The topic is the company, not the product. HighKing⁺⁺ 13:32, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.