Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GaleForce Digital Technologies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:33, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GaleForce Digital Technologies[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company that fails WP:N, when considered in light of WP:ORG. Coverage is either entirely local or does not surpass standard run of the mill coverage. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:16, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:46, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:46, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:48, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom, the article subject appears to be regional and not notable. In addtion, the primary source for the article [1] is taken from the subject company, and cannot be considered without WP:COI. SamHolt6 (talk) 15:17, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- advertorially toned and no claim of significance. Sources include routine announcements; fails CORPDEPTH and GNG. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:54, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.