Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galactic Investigations Unit: Part One

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 00:13, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Galactic Investigations Unit: Part One[edit]

No notability asserted, and explicitly fails future film notability guideline. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 06:45, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Incomplete film; production company unknown; actors do not seem to be notable (one of them turns up in google as author of a book, the other doesn't seem to turn up in google at all); production company named after the main actors... chances are this is just somebody's personal project. JulesH (talk) 09:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 10:42, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NFF. WWGB (talk) 10:51, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Racepacket (talk) 12:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 16:47, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and WP:USERFY back to author User:Samuel 09. If/when it gains notability, he might then bring it back. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:46, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. User:Samuel 09 has replied on my talk page. I copy his reply below for convenience. JulesH (talk) 12:41, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete film

That is because the film is currently in production and being filmed.

actors do not seem to be notable (one of them turns up in google as author of a book, the other doesn't seem to turn up in google) at all

GOOGLE DOES NOT HAVE EVERYTHING ON EVERYONE, Are you on Google? If you type Galactic Investigations Unit: Part One into Google, you will find that GIU is one of the first Articles.

production company named after the main actors

So. You going to go after Jerry Bruckheimer next?

chances are this is just somebody's personal project

This "personal project" if you bothered to look at the external link, is actually an Australian Film Commision Film, financed by the Australian Film Commision.

You may want to double-check your information instead of going around and asking for stuff to be deleted unless you have the correct information.

Samuel 09 (talk) 11:35, 24 January 2009 (UTC) Samuael 09[reply]

My reply: no, you won't find me on google. But then I'm not notable, and have multiple namesakes who are. Google isn't a guarantee of notability, but for people like actors, writers and film producers it's a pretty good guide. I'm not aware that Bruckheimer has starred in any of the films he's produced. IMDB isn't, either. The external link does not state that the film was financed by the AFC. It is a link to a database run by the AFC, but it aims to be a complete database of all films produced in Australia, and doesn't include any information about financing. JulesH (talk) 13:04, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My Reply: Pretty Good Guide isn't good enough.

I'm not aware that Bruckheimer has starred in any of the films he's produced

Hasn't got anything to do with it really.

I know that the Movie is going ahead and going to be released in Australia, so if you want to delete it, that's up to you. Just don't be dissapointed when you see the Release of "GIU" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Samuel 09 (talk • contribs) 06:44, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.