Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gajol Haji Nakoo Muhammad High School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 14:44, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gajol Haji Nakoo Muhammad High School[edit]

Gajol Haji Nakoo Muhammad High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This has been to AfD before, but that was before Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 133#RfC on secondary school notability. Fails WP:GNG. Cordless Larry (talk) 12:37, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: unless nominator is able to provide assurances that they have conducted in concentrated in print and/or local media. (I note that the local language is not English). This is a weak nomination and should be opposed on the basis of WP:BEFORE, and the outcome of RfC on secondary school notability unless that can be demonstrated. Jack4576 (talk) 15:24, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
conducted concentrated searches in* Jack4576 (talk) 15:24, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I checked ProQuest and Nexis for print sources. The school's website was entirely in English when it was live and as LibStar notes, there are only English sources cited in the Bengali Wikipedia version. I think that's enough due diligence, but if significant independent coverage in non-English sources subsequently emerges then the article can be recreated; I don't think that's a good argument for keeping a poor-quality article based on insufficient English-language sources in the meantime. Cordless Larry (talk) 15:12, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm satisfied these searches are sufficient for WP's policies. Delete is a legitimate, albiet sad outcome. Jack4576 (talk) 18:12, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    You will need to strike out your "oppose" above. LibStar (talk) 00:11, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.