Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gajab Thai Gayo !

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify. czar 13:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gajab Thai Gayo[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:PROMO. Period! Hence, calling for an AfD discussion. - Hatchens (talk) 12:05, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 12:05, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:27, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I cannot see any indication that it meets the requirements of WP:NFP.--Gronk Oz (talk) 14:34, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As its regional film and having a concepts on the knowledge and language. The more citation about the film under process and I will be updating it the soon. Requesting you not to delete the page. Ankitbhm (talk) 13:12, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The article needs complete rewrite but it is notable film in Gujarati in my opinion. More references needed for sure. There are some references available in Gujarati as it is a Gujarati film. -Nizil (talk) 05:37, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am cleaning up for WP:PROMO issues and add more refs.-Nizil (talk) 05:43, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The film has sources for notability. Coderzombie (talk) 11:09, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I kindly requesting you to support filmmakers and regional cinema. Instead of supporting you are sending page for deletion without suggesting improvements. Kindly let me know what sort of requirement need to keep the page. Ankitbhm (talk) 13:14, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify as the film is scheduled to be released next week and has a probability of attaining notability per WP:NFO. Once it did, it could be moved back to mainspace, else will go into a slow death of WP:G13 — DaxServer (t · m · c) 11:10, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 02:08, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify per WP:NFF, with the potential that the film may receive independent coverage once the film is released. BOVINEBOY2008 15:51, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify as WP:TOOSOON; Not enough coverage on production to meet WP:NFF but notability may be attained after its release with the help of reliable reviews -- Ab207 (talk) 09:12, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have been trying to close this discussion for a few hours but XFDCloser seems to be having problems with the page title as I keep getting error messages whether I try to close it from the AFD list page or the individual AFD discussion page. Maybe another admin will have more success. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:30, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I report the same issue as @Liz and am unable to close it. Will ping maintainer. Star Mississippi 00:34, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.