Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gail Werbin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 03:07, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gail Werbin[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. Her film career consists of two editing jobs which got very little attention (as in, one sentence in one book, and otherwise just passing mentions). Het football career seems to have been short-lived and fairly unremarkable as well. Fram (talk) 09:23, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:34, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:34, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:34, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. - Funky Snack (Talk) 09:44, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:54, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:54, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:54, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can see there is no claim of notablity per WP:NFOOTBALL. Sheldybett (talk) 08:32, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the 1973 Los Angeles Times feature piece is plainly non-trivial coverage, in my opinion subject passes WP:BIO. WP:NFOOTBALL isn’t relevant because this person played American Football not association football please at least read the page before voting delete, yikes. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 21:36, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is there another source that shows she meets WP:GNG? One source is not enough and I don't believe she meets any other notability criteria. Papaursa (talk) 23:16, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment She swam before she played football, and there are some sources for that. I'll add them, and the extra info from them (year of birth, father's name, high school, etc). There may be enough to meet WP:ANYBIO. RebeccaGreen (talk) 04:00, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.