Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gagik Manoukian

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:20, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gagik Manoukian[edit]

Gagik Manoukian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was deleted once previously as WP:G12, and there are still some probably considerable close paraphrasing issues, but it's a bit hard to tell because it looks like the author has altered the particular wording so that verbatim searches don't tell much.

There are serious tone issues anyway, although it's arguably poorly written vaguely promotional English, rather than well written obviously promotional English. And I sympathize.

Web searches don't return very much of anything at all. Unless some of these claimed collections are permanent and important or some of this persons works is renouned and widely covered in a way that is at least non-obvious to me, I don't think there much to expect the subject passes WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO or WP:NARTIST. TimothyJosephWood 17:23, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete As I explained to the editor who created the article: I'm concerned about the notability of the subject and his exhibition record. I don't recognize any of the exhibition venues, except one, Allingawier (I'm from the Netherlands). Allingawier is a tiny village that has approximately 60-80 inhabitants (it depends on how you count) but it definitely has no castle. Naturally, this makes me wonder about the other venues; a "personal exhibition in /Berlin/Prague/Oslo"? Unless there are independent, reliable sources that allow us to verify these claims, I'm afraid we're going to have to dismiss them and conclude that the subject fails our notability criteria. Mduvekot (talk) 17:53, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:14, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Armenia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:14, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:15, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Neither the references that are provided nor the hits on a Google search indicate a notable artist. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:25, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete no indication the subject comes close to passing the notability guidelines for artists.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:35, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete As above.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.