Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabrielle Dal Busco

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 22:59, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gabrielle Dal Busco[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has been tagged as a notability concern for just over three years now. I could not find even one example of extensive coverage from an independent source. There is this but it isn't independent and is too short anyway to be of much use. Fails WP:GNG unless I'm missing something. Spiderone 22:43, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:43, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:43, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:43, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:43, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 22:46, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:BIO. Zero useful coverage. Java Hurricane 08:45, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 09:34, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per above. Fails WP:BASIC. Pilean (talk) 10:11, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NFOOTBALL failure. Number 5 7 15:13, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per norm

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.