Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriele Corno

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete under G4 by User:Legoktm. (non-admin closure) Funny ^Pika! 11:54, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gabriele_Corno[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. Entire article looks like advertising. Sources are all first person, personal site, linked in etc. Many sources listed don't even have the subjects name anywhere on the page. Suggested deletion. Article and creator have already had other items (for the same account) Speedy deleted. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Gabriele_Corno_(author)

Comment: It looks like this was a recreation of the article by the same editor that created the previous version. The two articles are very, very close in how they're written, but this new version seems like it might have a few more sources that might not have been in the previous version. It has a paragraph of new material as well. I'm going to compare the sources- it might be close enough that it could be speedyable as a copy of an already deleted page. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:55, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Might also be speedyable as sheer promotion as well. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:56, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The sources are pretty much the same as in the previous edition. I'll tag it as a speedy. I also endorse a block of the original editor. Apparently this is the third time he's created this, the previous attempts being Gabriele Corno (author) and Corno Gabriele. I think that at this point, given that he's had these articles deleted multiple times and has only used Wikipedia as a place for self promotion, he's had more than enough warnings and should be blocked. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:01, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
We might also want to salt these name entries to avoid him trying to reuse them. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:03, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Correction: This is actually the fourth time he's had pages deleted. There was a prior version of the current article under this specific title that was deleted on April 1st by DGG. It wasn't the same as this version, but it further hammers home that the editor is just here to spam for himself. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:05, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.