Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabbar Sangrur

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:41, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gabbar Sangrur[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~No Notable work Visiable on this Page WP:GNG Rohit5001849W (talk) 08:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)~~ striking confirmed, blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Rohit5001849W (talk) 08:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:31, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Although they are related, notability of an artist is not nesscesarily measured by the notability of their works (especially for articles about theatre actors and small authors). And there is credits listed here, wikilinked, in the paragraph. I admit this stub is in poor shape, but Sangrur seems to meet WP:GNG (for example, seems to be WP:SIGCOV on The Indian Express, listed as reliable on WP:RSP). — VORTEX³⁴²⁷ (Talk!) 08:46, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

~~How he seems to meet WP:GNG? It requires multiple WP:SIGCOV. Yandeńo (talk)~~ 12:34, 17 November 2022 (UTC)(sock strike Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:26, 24 November 2022 (UTC))[reply]

Keep: As Vortex3427 said. LordVoldemort728 (talk) 09:14, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per nom, this article fails WP:GNG. Yandeńo (talk) 12:34, 17 November 2022 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 06:32, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Out of the 9 sources listed as of the time in writing, Source 3, Source 5, Source 7 and Source 9 merely referenced the subject for one or two quotes; Source 6 and Source 8 did not provide the same family name as the subject in question, so it's unclear if they're actually referencing the subject of this wiki article; Source 1 read like a promotion and did not demonstration the significance of either the artist or his work; and the other two sources from the Indian Express are behind paywall, so the extent of the coverage of the subject is unclear. Sources where the subject is covered in a greater extent would be needed, including but not limited to: More significant and exclusive reporting/interview of the subject; Articles that demonstrated the significance of the artist's work (viewership, reviews, revenues, etc.); Profile page of the subject in a credible and independent film-related sites; Or the official inclusion of the subject's name as the recipient of some notable awards. Otherwise, this article does not meet WP:GNG as far as I can tell. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 02:34, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per source analysis by Tutwakhamoe. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:52, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:22, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete socks are out again I see. Agree with the source analysis by Tut. I don't find much of anything for sourcing, but the name hits on many variations of it. Oaktree b (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per sources analyses performed here. 多少战场龙 (talk) 13:25, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.