Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaïa Jacquet-Matisse

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:37, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gaïa Jacquet-Matisse[edit]

Gaïa Jacquet-Matisse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Don’t see how the person in question is notable enough to have their own article, as per wp:BIO. Only notability is being the descendant of other people and having an Instagram presence with Tiffany Trump. Film roles are so minor, don’t even have articles into themselves. Seems like self-promotion. StevenBjerke97 talk 19:52, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:37, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Not much for reliable sources, this [1] and this [2]. Cultured mag looks ok, the Artnet piece is a two-person interview with her mother. Rest are typical celebrity fluff pieces. Leaning delete. Oaktree b (talk) 00:23, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.