Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GTAGuides.com (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:45, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
GTAGuides.com[edit]
Non-notable web forum failing WP:WEB. Article information seems to be unverifiable or original research. I requested sources 1.5 months ago and got no responses. Was previously deleted here. Delete as unverifiable, OR, and failing WP:WEB. Wickethewok 07:54, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as failing WP:WEB. No WP:RS indicating notability. Admins, is this a {{db-g4}}-able repost, or a substantially different article? --Kinu t/c 08:02, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Its different, so not g4-able. Wickethewok 08:05, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, alexa = 1,013,753: [1]. MER-C 08:41, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom - WP:WEB. SkierRMH,08:56, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Koweja 15:37, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable, but possibly mention the Jack Thompson incident in one of the articles on him. Koweja 15:37, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- If someone can find a reliable published source for it that is. Wickethewok 20:30, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable. Possible external link in GTA article? Somitho 12:56, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:WEB.--RWR8189 16:21, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt per nom and WP:WEB. Salt due to recreation. Anomo 12:10, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt - Only desperate claim to notability is an attempt to ride on the coat-tails of the Jack Thomson/GTA situation. Wikipedia is not an advertising service. The Kinslayer 10:24, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.