Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GP40MC Locomotive
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to EMD GP40-based passenger locomotives#GP40MC. (non-admin closure) Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 00:23, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
GP40MC Locomotive[edit]
- GP40MC Locomotive (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Likely permastub with no assertion of notability. Article is a complete mess. Probably should be merged with something; just not sure what Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈ 20:26, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This looks like one of many nicely done stubs on individual GMD Locomotives. Knowing the number of train buffs and train buff publications out there wp:notability-suitable source probably exist. So I think that these are valid as a bunch of nicely done stubs, but would be better off in a consolidated article on GMD locomotives. North8000 (talk) 20:46, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Nicely done? It's incomplete, and rife with broken links and grammatical errors! Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈ 22:55, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This is a model of locomotive, of which 25 were said to have been made. No references were included in the article to satisfy WP:N. Edison (talk) 23:42, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy redirect to EMD GP40, which should have been done before coming to AfD. - The Bushranger One ping only 02:25, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Um, I didn't know where to redirect it to before you mentioned a plausible redirect target. I started the AfD at least in part to find plausible redirect targets Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈ 03:57, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- No worries. - The Bushranger One ping only 20:45, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Um, I didn't know where to redirect it to before you mentioned a plausible redirect target. I started the AfD at least in part to find plausible redirect targets Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈ 03:57, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect, although I have a different target. This is a duplication of the GMD GP40MC article and that redirects to EMD GP40-based passenger locomotives#GP40MC. I suggest a merge of the EMD GP40-based passenger locomotives and EMD GP40 articles though. Edgepedia (talk) 18:12, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.