Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GNU PDF

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:39, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GNU PDF[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The GNU PDF project is dead; it no longer has a website and there has been no development for years. The project never produced any notable software. CapitalSasha ~ talk 18:50, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. What you say is true. There is no there there. GangofOne (talk) 22:24, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 08:21, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:32, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. The Free Software Foundation ref is a press release and not independent. A search turned up additional Free Software Foundation content, and this linux.com article but no other significant WP:RS coverage. As above, this project is defunct so future significant coverage is highly unlikely.Dialectric (talk) 19:50, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as I see no better improvement. SwisterTwister talk 04:40, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Notwithstanding the relevant guideline (WP:Notability_does_not_degrade_over_time), this never seems to have been notable, and its only reference is it being discontinued.--69.204.153.39 (talk) 18:09, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Nothing to show it passes notability guidelines. Only alternative would be to merge to the GNU article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:18, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.