Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GMB Publishing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 00:24, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GMB Publishing[edit]

Unsourced article on Publishing company -- no articulation of notability Oo7565 (talk) 21:59, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:CORP. Schuym1 (talk) 23:36, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: not notable, no value. Vanity page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SteveLoughran (talk • contribs) 23:03, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Insufficient notability per guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:59, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep based on improved article and DGG's investigation of notability. ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:13, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep some of the books have respectable holding in WorldCat: example, and it is therefore appropriate for there to be an article. I just now reduced the excessively spammy article. DGG (talk) 04:02, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Although there is indication that the company has several publications (particularly a series based on business enviornment in different countries), I could not find any third-party sources indicating that the books/series is particularly notable. The company site lists reviews of its books. But it's hard to confirm the reviews, the ones that are notable among others. ^LeaveSleaves 19:08, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.