Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GK Bhatnagar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Redirect can be done editorially if so desired. Daniel (talk) 13:58, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GK Bhatnagar[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, no coverage found. Störm (talk) 08:54, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete there is nothing even close to enough to pass the GNG here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not enough sources to pass WP:GNG. Cuoxo (talk) 15:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NCRICKET RationalPuff (talk) 18:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Rajasthan cricketers - I agree that he isn't notable but strongly believe ATD should be considered Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:53, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.