Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GAMES Magazine bankruptcy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Merge. Tagged the merged section as {{Disputed-section}} per Andrew Lenahan --Ezeu 20:53, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GAMES Magazine bankruptcy[edit]

I can find no proof of this. This is the author's first post. If nothing else, it should be merged with GAMES Magazine Bayyoc 04:27, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per nom. DVD+ R/W 04:30, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I've put the contents of this on Talk:GAMES Magazine so the proof can be hashed out there. It doesn't deserve its own article, but it's a good story and if true might belong on GAMES Magazine. - Rainwarrior 04:45, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge pending verification per nom: be careful about copy and pasting contents, as failure to copy over the edit history, IIRC, violates the terms of the GFDL. TheProject 04:56, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom - CNichols 05:22, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If verifiable, merge per nom, but if it can't be verified, delete it. I have been reading GAMES Magazine on and off for over 20 years, and this is the first I ever heard about this story. --Metropolitan90 05:51, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Merge per WP:V and Metropolitan90. --Slgrandson 06:23, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless verification is provided. I have been a Games reader since the magazine started, and I have never seen this mentioned anywhere. — Michael J 14:04, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If this is merged or kept, it will have to be a total rewrite, as this version of events is totally wrong. Here's an article with the real story, if anyone is curious. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:06, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
merge pn. M1ss1ontomars2k4 17:21, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge -- getcrunk juice ^contribs 19:11, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Newyorktimescrossword 02:02, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge otherwise delete--Nick Y. 21:44, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.