Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G9 (album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 03:19, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

G9 (album)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

G9 (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NALBUM. I performed WP:BEFORE and found out that this album did not attain at least gold status like other Gloc 9 albums such as Lihim at Liham and MKNM. I also did not find any awards or charted hits. --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:46, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Lenticel ^(talk) 01:46, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Lenticel ^(talk) 01:46, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.