Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G. Karagiannopoulos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:37, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

G. Karagiannopoulos[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTDATABASE. The lack of basic biographical details, such as his first name, date of birth, and date of death, means such coverage is unlikely to ever be found.

Article was procedurally kept in an AFD last month, with no prejudice against immediate AFD nominations for individual pages. BilledMammal (talk) 04:26, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. BilledMammal (talk) 04:26, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. BilledMammal (talk) 04:26, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is no significant coverage at all. We do not even know how he performed in the one competition we have any knowledge of him having been in.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:46, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:00, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per nom and above. The one source in the article seems reliable, but just as it was said at the RSN, I do object to the hundreds, maybe even thousands of articles being made solely using this source. Bsoyka (talk) 15:21, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- It is on the order of thousands maybe even tens of thousands of articles that use only this source, at least if we group in those that use only it and or sportsreference.com, which I am pretty sure is a very closely related source.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:15, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.