Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G.V. Sreekumar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:30, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

G.V. Sreekumar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD declined as article had previously been prod'ed last year. Since then no sources have been added to the article, and his official biography (http://www.idc.iitb.ac.in/gvsree/bio.html) shows nothing that would indicate notability. The reason given previously for keeping the article was: "professors at IIT are generally notable, one of the best schools in India" -but this is obviously untrue, not every minor professor at a good university merits a wikipedia article, especially those whose claim to notability is so minor as to be an unsourced, orphan article. Fails WP:N, WP:BIO, WP:PROF Ajbpearce (talk) 19:31, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - does not meet WP:PROF--Sodabottle (talk) 06:07, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Salih (talk) 14:22, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Salih (talk) 14:22, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not seeing enough here to satisfy WP:PROF. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 16:02, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.