Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fyreball

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 14:21, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fyreball[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article on an obscure startup which failed over 5 years ago, which is included in a single category which has absolutely nothing to do with the article. Devoid of any notability and relevance. Mecanismo | Talk 09:23, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The article has been created and maintained either by non-registered users or accounts whose single purpose was to maintain this article and link it to other articles on wikipedia. Appears to be spam for a defunct startup. -- Mecanismo | Talk 09:27, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This tale about the rise and fall of an online business underlines why history making accomplishments, or at least notoriety, should be needed before any commercial enterprise becomes an encyclopedia subject. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 01:44, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.