Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FuzzFind

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 09:23, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FuzzFind[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable website ranking >600000 in Alexa. References are not significant. Haakon (talk) 15:50, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable, looks more like cheap advertising. I would agree with the statement of low Alexa rankings, but as a webmaster myself, Most web rankings are meaningless as they are inaccurate most of the time. I have several sites that have more traffic than sites ranking higher on Alexa. I can also show sites ranking on Alexa that haven't been online in many months. Don't go by rankings! Alan - talk 05:33, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Why not edit the article instead of deleting it? There are so many other search engines in the List of search engines that have similar entries.Lildev (talk) 15:06, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non notable meta search engine with no coverage in reliable sources -- Whpq (talk) 22:00, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:24, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Existing sources do not show notability. Miami33139 (talk) 00:37, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.