Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Futurednb.net
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 12:01, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Futurednb.net[edit]
- Futurednb.net (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unable to find much in the way of reliable, secondary sources which provide coverage of this music web site. Kmag probably at least has been at times, at a wide level, somewhat reliable, the link used as a reference and this more recent update, the two references here look more to be quick blog posts, and perhaps written from PRs, and don't quite seem to me to have reached the GNG bar. Tried the usual Googley searches plus Highbeam, which sometimes comes through on coverage of media, but not here. Additional sources welcome. j⚛e deckertalk 17:12, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 22:12, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 01:03, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - as seems promotional. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 01:19, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As per Joe Decker my searches have not turned up any references that could demonstrate WP:NWEB notability. AllyD (talk) 08:15, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.