Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future railroad ideas of Wisconsin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:25, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Future railroad ideas of Wisconsin[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is almost entirely unsourced and appears to be fabricated. Searches for several of the listed railroads yielded no relevant results. –dlthewave ☎ 20:15, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. TMG^talk 21:24, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. TMG^talk 21:24, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. TMG^talk 21:24, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:NOTCRYSTAL comes to mind. 22:22, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
delete per nom. I couldnn't verify any of this either, and I don't think this is an encyclopedic subject anyway. Mangoe (talk) 14:17, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I wonder if this can be moved to a contributor's userpage. It seems at least somewhat encyclopedic, but if it's not sourced and it's attributed to the future, it could possibly be included in someone's userpage until these entries can be sourced and confirmed. TNats ₃ 00:38, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The creator has a copy of the list on their talk page. –dlthewave ☎ 01:44, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, then definitely delete. TNats ₃ 04:31, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless it was well sourced including indications that they were definitely going to heppen, Wikipedia doesn't have articles like this. Sources like that do not seem to exist for this topic. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 23:57, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.