Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future Nostalgia: The Moonlight Edition

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Future Nostalgia. WP:TOOSOON applies. Fails WP:NALBUM also. (non-admin closure) HĐ (talk) 10:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Future Nostalgia: The Moonlight Edition[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page could easily be merged into the Future Nostalgia article, as it does not have enough information to stand on its own. Due Lipa's first album has various editions, too, including a re-issue called Complete Edition, and we also didn't make a separate article for that version of the album. Sricsi (talk) 08:36, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Sricsi (talk) 08:36, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As per how it stands right now, Delete. If there are more reliable sources that can establish the notability of the article in the future, yeah. But right now it looks like redundancy. — Tom^(T2ME) 09:58, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect - this has been created WP:TOOSOON and speculatively. There are tonnes of albums that have re-releases. Future Nostalgia has many re-releases but there is not enough information to ascertain that this version of the album is going to get 'x' amount of coverage to warrant an independent article. If in the end, the chart positions and sales are counted towards a single listing for Future Nostalgia, then absolutely a separate article is not warranted. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 10:35, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete & Merge - I agree with what User:Sricsi said! I think for now we should merge it to the Future Nostalgia page. Jack Reynolds (talk to me!) (email me!!) 14:22, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Future Nostalgia -- WP:TOOSOON applies. Article may be good in the future, but not now. HĐ (talk) 15:29, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. HĐ (talk) 15:30, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - it's a plausible search term, but otherwise, we generally just cover deluxe edition re-releases within the already existing album article. No need for a split. Sergecross73 msg me 18:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Future Nostalgia - I would have assumed this would pass the notability threshold with album reviews, but as it currently stands, this should be merged into the main article (WP:CRYSTALBALL, WP:TOOSOON).--N Ø 13:25, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect per above. It's just a reissue. There is no article for Lipa's Dua Lipa: Complete Edition for example. --Kuatrero (talk) 01:18, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Future Nostalgia - WP:TOOSOON. --Ashley yoursmile! 11:59, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Future Nostalgia. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 12:33, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Future Nostalgia. Enough said. --Mediafanatic17 (talk) 22:28, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Future Nostalgia per above. Maybe it will gain notability in the future. LOVI 33 17:29, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Future Nostalgia for reasons listed above. As well, I’d like it if there was a section in the article dedicated to the moonlight edition, with its own Infobox and everything. That would save a lot of confusion with the main Infobox. D💘ggy54321 ^(xoxo😘) 20:40, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

^ Since the decision is quite clear, can we close this early? --Sricsi (talk) 20:50, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As much as I want to close this (non-admin closure), I think those who voted could not close. Pinging some coordinators could help. HĐ (talk) 06:08, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

~~Given an overwhelming consensus to merge/redirect, I shall close this as a non-admin as it is not controversial at all.~~ Just notice the AFD needs seven days before proceeding. Let's wait. HĐ (talk) 03:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.