Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Further Adventures in Babysitting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 01:10, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Further Adventures in Babysitting[edit]

A film not yet in production doesn't meet WP:NFF or WP:NOT#CRYSTAL; disputed prod Accounting4Taste:talk 01:42, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete looks like a hoax, see other articles from same creator. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:48, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I don't see anything about the author that would lead a person to conclude that s/he is making edits in bad faith and purposefully creating hoaxes. Hazillow (talk) 02:02, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment this was the editor who deprodded That's So Raven: The Vision That Changes Everything. I'd consider contributions from this user highly suspect, and (as with any user) the burden is on them to provide reliable sources. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:10, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but needs a complete revision. The film is set to be released in 2008, leading me to believe it is in production. A future movie template and a major revision is in order. Hazillow (talk) 02:02, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I decided to improve this article enough to close this AfD but couldn't find anything to confirm that this is even still going forward. As I typing this, NrDg confirms it.Hazillow (talk) 03:50, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This movie was in planning stage almost a year ago but never moved past that point. Both principals are committed to other movies currently so this movie will not happen. Need a lot more than it was a consideration that didn't work out to have an article.--NrDg 03:42, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also see deleted article Further Adventures In Babysitting deleted per notability guidelines for films as not in production at that time either. Specifically WP:NFF "Films which have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced shooting should not have their own articles."--NrDg 03:51, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 03:49, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I tried to find reliable sources after marking the problematic areas with various tags, but I couldn't find anything. I arrived at the same conclusion as User:Hazillow and User:NrDg. J Readings (talk) 03:55, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Racepacket (talk) 04:37, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not really a hoax as the others are, but still should be deleted per NrDg. JuJube (talk) 05:55, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete if for not better reason than it's incredibly poorly written. 68.229.184.37 (talk) 12:46, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If we need to we can undelete the original Further Adventures In Babysitting - it had evolved fairly well before it was deleted.--NrDg 14:26, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The Imdb page is basically non-existant: no cast, crew, nothing. It fails WP:NFF. I wouldn't be surprised if it is a hoax due to the other contributions of the article's creator Doc Strange^{Telepathic Messages}_{Strange Frequencies} 17:56, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.