Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fun (band) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Kevin (talk) 00:17, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fun (band)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable band. Damiens.rf 00:21, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 00:40, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. At the least, criterion 1 of WP:BAND appears to be met, with articles at Spin, Paste, The Arizona Republic, and a small biography at Allmusic. Gongshow ^Talk 00:52, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Per Gongshow's first three sources. Joe Chill (talk) 01:49, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Damiens, looks like we got a winner. Still, glad you brought it up. =) Gongshow, good finds there. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 01:50, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – meets WP:BAND criterion #1; in addition to the above, the subject has also had coverage in The Washington Post and The Boston Globe. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 03:15, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above DRosin (talk) 11:56, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Artist meets WP:BAND criteria #1 and #6 (as the band contains members of the notable groups Steel Train and The Format). Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 21:27, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Snow keep. This nomination is a waste of everyones' time. WP:BEFORE would have avoided it.--Epeefleche (talk) 22:17, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep They've been getting a lot of buzz this year.--Remurmur (talk) 19:44, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Just a suggestion -- if the nom is agreeable at this point to this closing as a snow keep (given the unanimity of all others here), that might perhaps save some people some time.--Epeefleche (talk) 00:17, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per everything listed both here and in the first nomination... come on now --Tflynn17 (talk) 19:49, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.