Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FunAdvice.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:06, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FunAdvice.com[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

searched for coverage - there is maybe one article that I can see which would count as recognisable independent reliable source - have to conclude that I don't think this is notable. _nonsense ferret 19:11, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I could find only one "news" type source and that was from a private blog. Couldn't find a single reliable source, let alone enough to quantify "significant coverage". Stalwart111 02:57, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. It's a Fox! (What did I break) 15:59, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because it appears to have no reliable 3rd-party sources and I do not see any sources indicating notability.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 12:01, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.