Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fufuao

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SK#1, the nomination was withdrawn by the nominator, and no one other than the nominator recommends that the page be deleted or redirected. Mz7 (talk) 04:21, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fufuao[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No information in WP:RSes nor in official census sources. The village or whatever it is seems very much non-notable. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:33, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:33, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 16:45, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The area and population in the infobox are from the census (https://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/DCHB_A/09/0964_PART_A_DCHB_GHAZIPUR.pdf), which also mentions that it has a primary school and a middle school. The name in the census is Rampur Phuphuaon, and the Hindi Wikipedia article has another reference but I couldn't find either the names used here in Google Books search of the source; could it be that there are other forms of the name? Peter James (talk) 14:43, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:46, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:46, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep: I would like to withdraw this as per WP:SK. Apart from the link posted by Peter James above, I was able to get another census link here. Also this one (in Hindi). A legally-defined area, thus passing WP:GNG in my opinion. Transliteration is partly to blame why it is difficult to search t in English. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:18, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.