Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fucktard
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 00:58, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fucktard[edit]
Wikipedia is not a slang dictionary. Unnecessary disambiguation page that makes Wikipedia look stupid, to be totally honest, which we'd be better without. h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 22:49, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per WP:NEO. Jd027chat 22:56, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. and WP:NOT#DICT. JohnCD (talk) 22:58, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- delete -- unless we develop a fucktardpedia. •Jim62sch•dissera! 22:58, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd also recommend salting this title.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 23:17, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fairly non-notable portmanteau neologism I'd have thought. cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:35, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete There are articles in Wikipedia that go much farther than this one towards making this encyclopeida "look stupid." But I can't find much support for keeping the article. A search of Google News archive [1] shows dozens of articles in alternative press such as Village Voice which assert that many national leaders are fucktards, but they do not discuss the term itself. Google scholar [2] likewise came up with only a smattering of uses. Edison (talk) 02:12, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, Encyclopedia Britannica would probably not have an entry for "fucktard", and with good reason. I tend towards inclusionism, but this, I believe, is worthless in an encyclopedia.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 02:15, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- And I'm almost certain that Jimbo would agree with me on this point.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 02:31, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Already listed in Wiktionary at http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Fucktard --Eastmain (talk) 04:04, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO and article is stupidly self-referential (not that that goes towards deletion, just annoys me). JuJube (talk) 22:39, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 15:18, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.