Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fruity Pie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No policy/guideline based consensus to delete. Chinese sources are available and the article should be kept to avoid systematic bias. Philg88 ^♦talk 07:28, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fruity Pie[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A public television show with nothing about notability. (as amusing and odd as this show does sound part of me wants it to stay for that reason ha ha) Wgolf (talk) 21:46, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 00:45, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 00:45, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

- I don't understand how this is more or less notable that any other children's show page, for example Thomas_the_Tank_Engine or Hook_Book_Row. A casual google search shows it airs every morning in the US and presumably in Taiwan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.162.16.12 (talk) 14:59, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 02:15, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It has apparently won an Asia Television Award. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:43, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rsrikanth05-ooh good find, sounds like that could be notable. I think when I was looking over the article it sounded like a local show that isn't anywhere else but some town or something. Maybe a userfy?Wgolf (talk) 15:26, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you could. Hey @Brain:, please have a look at the discussion here. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 17:12, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 01:32, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - I'm not sure how notable the award mentioned above is (given that it doesn't even have a Wikipedia article), but a search of its name in Chinese (水果冰淇淋) suggests that it has had coverage in reliable sources (such as the Epoch Times). I can't understand Chinese though, and Google Translate in unreliable for these things, so I'm requesting that a Chinese-speaking user take a further look at search results. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 03:16, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.