Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fruitling Fern

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:G3. (non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:46, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fruitling Fern[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hoax. No such plant known as "Fruitling Fern" or "Equisetopsidada". Some of the text is copied from Equisetopsida while the remainder is blatant nonsense. Plantdrew (talk) 20:09, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Archaeology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:34, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:34, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as hoax. Surprisingly restrained approach there, actually, but blew it with the wrestling mud puppies at the end.--Elmidae (talk · contribs) 20:47, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

i have done nothing wrong! i found and cataloged this plant myself — Preceding unsigned comment added by PlantAss (talk • contribs) 12:07, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - tagged for speedy delete as hoax. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 12:39, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.