Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frokus
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 04:43, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Frokus[edit]
- Frokus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not finding enough reliable sources CynofGavuf 09:35, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Updated article to include some sources. There are not many, but hopefully two is enough for now. Invot (talk) 07:33, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 12:21, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I wasn't able to find any reliable sources about this band, there were a few about the military operations with the same name. Fails WP:N. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:44, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — This isn't a notable article. I searched google and got only 5000 hits. Btilm 22:51, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - "The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source." The article states that they will be opening for Pearl Jam, which will be a very notable event in the time line of alternative rock music. Also, out of all the bands from their area (Bay City) they do return close to the most results on Google. Though only 5,000, that is still a significant amount of results. Invot (talk) 18:09, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- That's the speedy deletion criteria. Articles for deletion is more demanding. This page does not meet that criteria. CynofGavuf 11:42, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.