Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frob (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was transwiki. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 11:42, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Frob[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dictionary definition. Specifically from WP:ISNOT "Wikipedia is not a dictionary, usage, or jargon guide." This very clearly is a jargon guide on this particular term. There's nothing wrong with that, but the Wiktionary is the place (if anywhere) for word articles like this and/or a glossary in the Wikipedia, but because under the AFD policy it fails ISNOT/dicdef it may not have its own article.

I'm calling for TRANSWIKI. - Wolfkeeper 01:29, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Transwiki per above, and as it seems somewhat notable enough to be transwikied. fetchcomms☛ 01:51, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — and transwiki, per above. ContinueWithCaution (talk) 02:22, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki, with softredirect. No expansion has occurred in the 4 years since its last afd. -- Quiddity (talk) 03:12, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki to wiktionary. There's already a tag on it, swap it with {{copy to wiktionary}} and the TW people should catch it. 76.66.197.2 (talk) 05:22, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.