Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fritz Carlton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 11:40, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fritz Carlton[edit]

This WP:BLP is unverifiable; the subject and his theories appear to be completely made up. There are no pertinent Google hits except the subject's own conspiracy theory website http://dotheyexist.com, claiming to be hosted by the University of Königsberg, which apparently no longer exists since after World War II. Compare also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embe about a related article by the same hoaxer. Sandstein 21:17, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm unable to find any independent sources for this at all, and the affiliation with a nonexistent university doesn't help. Fails WP:V. (One wonders whether he has a colleague named Waldorph Astoria.) Deor (talk) 22:14, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Doer's comments. Königsberg hasn't existed since WW2. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 02:46, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:30, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If not a hoax, then fails WP:V. Given the probability that it is a hoax, perhaps the portrait should be removed following WP:BLP, as that could show a real person. --Crusio (talk) 05:03, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Studied not at Oxford nor Cambridge but at Oxbridge? Works at Königsberg? Hoax. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:35, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as hoax. Edward321 (talk) 14:56, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not seem to pass notability requirements under WP:PROF or WP:BIO, probably due to not existing in the real world. “Carlton” a German name? Yeah right!--Eric Yurken (talk) 02:23, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.