Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fritz Bittenbender

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:35, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fritz Bittenbender[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no evidence for notability . An administrator, not a scientist. DGG ( talk ) 01:42, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. No evidence of notability is one thing but the argument that he is an administrator (an administrator, IMHO, brings to mind an administrative assistant or office manager, not an executive) and not a scientist is a bit ludicrous. Since when is there a hierarchy that a scientist trumps a business executive? Both occupations are important and one isn’t necessarily more important than the other. ThurstonMitchell (talk) 02:03, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No notable, independent reporting.--Bettydaisies (talk) 03:18, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:29, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:29, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

comment. To be consistent, nominate Robert S. Barnett, his predecessor, for the same exact reason. Both are stubs. Both list only primary sources. Both were COOs of PA. If one is wiki worthy, both are wiki w. If one isn’t, the other isn’t either. ThurstonMitchell (talk) 03:39, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 00:55, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: - article lacks notability and reliable, secondary sources. --Whiteguru (talk) 07:40, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:12, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete he does not meet Wikipedia:Notability (people) and general notability guidelines.--Kemalcan (talk) 13:40, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:GNG and WP:MILL. From his title, he might be a lobbyist or public affair person, and he might have an advanced degree, but there's not enough information in plain English. Bearian (talk) 16:28, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.