Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frio (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:24, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Frio (band)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about band which does not satisfy WP:BAND or WP:GNG. I could find no reliable hits in my searches for this band. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 12:51, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Sources were found recently. Thank you for your concern.--Jondel (talk) 07:13, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~Really? Where? Can you provide proof of these sources? Your statement does not help the discussion.~~ - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 13:27, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see now you added them as external links, I have removed as it was a blog and is not a reliable source, the other seems to be just routine coverage which does not help it towards the inclusion criteria.- McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 14:44, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 12:53, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 12:53, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The bottom indicated it came from a The Zamboanga Journal. Anyway Philippine Star seems reliable.--Jondel (talk) 11:59, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No reliable sources can be found to attest its notability. 121.54.54.171 (talk) 08:57, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is philippines star newspaper at the sources.--Jondel (talk) 11:59, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jondel, that's only one. Not enough anyway to support the subject (see WP:BARE). 121.54.54.171 (talk) 09:22, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your advice and sincere effort to keep out wiki garbage. I adding [1] more from a reputable newspaper Philippine Inquirer to the sources.--Jondel (talk) 11:12, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Zamboanga Today, a source.--Jondel (talk) 13:48, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 03:42, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It is notable and is mentioned in multiple popular Philippine newspapers. - Stranger195 (talk • contribs • guest book) 11:36, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just mentioned? or extensively covered? Popular newspapers or reliable newspapers? All but one of links provided in the article discuss the band in any sort of detail and it looks more like a Press release then actually editorial coverage and the only thing which states they have any sort of charting music which is suspect, bands that chart normally get much higher coverage then what has been found so far.McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 13:59, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:BAND. This band has NOT "been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works". Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 13:53, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - searches don't turn up anything to show they pass WP:GNG or WP:BAND. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:19, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.