Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frillo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:13, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Frillo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I declined a WP:CSD#A7 on a rather flimsy pretext, as the company does make a claim of having a possibly novel business model, and there are some sources. Unfortunately, they all look like press releases, and there's no actual independent coverage out there. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:26, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability as yet. Deb (talk) 11:49, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:01, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:01, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:03, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per notability. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 19:39, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- If there is no mark-up, I would guess there is no means of paying the overheads, making it a shortterm wonder. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:58, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as not notable and for lack of independent coverage in reliable sources. Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 06:34, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.