Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friend Me (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. After being listed here at AFD for a month, there's no clear consensus that this article needs to be deleted. Some discussion has risen about redirecting it, that's something that can be taken up on the talk page. (non-admin closure) Dusti*Let's talk!* 05:28, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Friend Me[edit]

Friend Me (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unaired show, it is unclear why it meets WP:GNG. It was a redirect for quite some time, and probably should have stayed a redirect. Ymblanter (talk) 09:58, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:03, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:03, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep unclear why it was a redirect; previous AFD closed as keep. As stated then, article has numerous wp:rs and as wp:ntemp, given that nothing has changed since then and now, no reason the article should now be deleted. Coverage more than demonstrates its notability. Dcfc1988 (talk) 20:57, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Well, since the last nomination it became clear that the project has been abandoned.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:14, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That's not true. The series was cancelled in July and the AFD was raised in October. Dcfc1988 (talk) 11:44, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:27, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Restore redirect Alan Kirschenbaum Nothing new has come out, though I do think the show details should be expanded within the Kirschenbaum article due to its circumstances. Nate (chatter) 09:04, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete see above comment Lubbad85 (talk) 01:44, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♠ 07:28, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (Talk) 17:56, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.