Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friedrich Jahn (physician)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy close. Page deleted as G5, created by globally-locked user Giovanni.prinzi. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 00:21, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Friedrich Jahn (physician)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet any specific notability criteria, not WP:GNG, a WP:BEFORE search shows up others with similar names but doesn't add much Melcous (talk) 21:43, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 21:53, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 21:53, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 21:53, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I cannot find any sources with significant coverage. The results on google seem to be for a different person with the same name. Natureium (talk) 01:58, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's important to disentangle any potential sources from those about Friedrich Ludwig Jahn, who was active at about the same time. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:51, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.