Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fried briefs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy deleted as vandalism. I didn't think it was that funny, but if anyone strongly disagrees send me a message and I'll dig it out for BJAODN. --Sam Blanning (formerly Malthusian) (talk) 11:32, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fried briefs[edit]

Unverifiable, unproven, suspected hoax Cozzlewood 10:24, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Article is genuine... not nonsense, says it all. --Katch Pole Piker 10:27, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, Katch Pole Piker is a vandal. [1] --Sam Blanning (formerly Malthusian) (talk) 10:36, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A bunch of vandal sockpuppets added keep votes to the article, impersonating regular editors. Most have been blocked indefinitely for impersonation, sockpuppetry and vandalism. Rather than bother to annotate every single vote I just removed them. Look in the history if you care. --Sam Blanning (formerly Malthusian) (talk) 10:56, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there is more about Fried Brief than Fried briefs on Google. Gu 10:59, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, nonsense. Proto||type 11:22, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete possible move to BJAODN. Eusebeus 11:25, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.