Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friday Night (The Darkness song) (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. LFaraone 00:43, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Friday Night (The Darkness song)[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Friday Night (The Darkness song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No consensus was deduced from the previous afd. I have decided to nominate this article again in order to generate consensus from the community. The song meets none of the 4 criteria at WP:MUS/SONGS.
- Criteria 1 The song has not been the subject of any independent coverage. All citations are taken from reviews of the album Permission to Land, therefore the album in its entirety is the subject. WP:MUS states The "subject" of a work means non-trivial treatment and excludes mere mention of the song/single. Therefore writing a sentence about a song in an album review does not indicate broad coverage.
- Criteria 2 The song is not a single and has not charted anywhere in the world.
- Criteria 3 The song has not won any awards or honors.
- Criteria 4 The song has never been independently released by any other notable artist. It has only appeared on 3 Darkness CDs; see Allmusic link [1] Bluidsports (talk) 15:38, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:48, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I agree with the article not meeting WP:NSONG. Even with the Music Video section and expanded critical reception, there is just nothing to show this song is notable on its own to have an independent article. User226 (talk) 20:55, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as lacking evidence of in depth coverage in independent reliable sources. If such sources are added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:42, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.