Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frida Berrigan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No evidence/argument presented for notability j⚛e decker ^talk 17:01, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Frida Berrigan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only superficial information is known about her, there doesn't appear to be any notable information–outside of the fact that she is the niece of Daniel Berrigan–and the only source cited is her own organization, which is not independent information. Ricksantorum2012 (talk) 13:46, 4 April 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

Delete not even an assertion of notability in the article. Writting one article that is namable and being a peace activist does not make someone notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:12, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The only sources provided are from institutions with which she is directly associated and a piece which she wrote herself. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:44, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.