Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free and open-source ATS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:11, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Free and open-source ATS[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Seems like advertisement. AhmadLX (talk) 16:00, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays~! ^{Babymissfortune} 17:16, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays~! ^{Babymissfortune} 17:16, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Editors comments to me (russh, original author of the page) were that there were not notable sources available. This differs from the comments above. A simple google search indicates that the following are authoritative for the industry;

https://blog.capterra.com/top-8-freeopen-source-applicant-tracking-software-solutions/

https://recruitingheadlines.com/10-free-applicant-tracking-systems/

https://www.quora.com/Is-there-an-open-source-recruitment-platform

These can replace the sources currently linked in the article.

Note that your comment regarding 'github pages are not reliable sources' - those links were to the respective Licensing for each project and therefore were absolutely a link to the authoritative source. russh (talk) 22:32, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for failing WP:GNG. WP:PRODUCT suggests we could merge or redirect to the organization or company that first created it but that's not entirely clear from the article. Ifnord (talk) 04:29, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:00, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.