Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free Software Magazine (China)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. SoWhy 06:45, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Free Software Magazine (China)[edit]

Free Software Magazine (China) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 07:33, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 07:34, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 07:34, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 07:34, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete. No indication it’s notable. Seems to be just a short-lived venture, republishing a number of articles from other sources for Chinese readers, but which folded before it really got going. Not tried searching, but seems pointless as "Free Software" applies to so many things.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 21:07, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 18:35, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947(c) (m) 04:30, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.